Okay, so I know that Albert Einstein already used the title. But I really didn’t have any other thing by which to call it without using a three mile title.

So, anyway, this is a very metaphysical observation of different physical forces corresponding with a mental force. It was some off site pondering between Malice and I which led to the conclusion.

So, my information on the general formations of gravity and friction may be a little off balance, and I would appreciate it if you would correct me if it is, but I do believe I have most of it down correctly.

Gravity is a necessity. We are surrounded by it all of our lives on Earth. Yet, it is a force we cannot directly feel; we don’t feel gravity, but its effect upon our bodies. We can tell that we are not about to suddenly float away from the Earth, because it has a gravitational pull toward us and us a gravitational pull toward it.
Yet, it is possible for a world to not have gravity. If a world were composed of a single unit, a single item of space, and no boundaries, this item would have no gravitational pull, having no opposite mass by which to create the force. And, this object could have no different pieces. It could not be a molecule, for an atom would have gravity toward another atom. It would have to be the smallest possible denomination of anything in an infinite space; thus, nothing by which to pull itself.

Friction is, nearly, the same idea. In a frictionful world, we do not feel friction. We may feel heat because of friction or have a scrape and pain because of it, but the force of friction is not able to be sensed by a human because it is an invisible, inexhaustible force (While friction may only hold a certain amount of force in the opposite direction, it is termed “inexhaustible” because it is always acting upon that object with some amount of force). And, friction only exists in a world in which two objects, touching, can rub against each other; thus, a frictionless universe could only have the smallest denomination of one object.

So, by these two arguments, it is impossible to have gravity without friction, and friction without gravity, simply because they follow the same basic rules of existence and are both created by interactions between objects.

There is one more force I would like to talk about; the aforementioned metaphysical force. It is the force of remembrance, and the ability to locate places, items, etc. through their relative distance between each other. So, let us think about this for a second.
I consider it a metaphysical force only because it cannot be measured as a physical force, yet it still exists.

So, what I am talking about has to do with this: Let’s say that you live three blocks away from… How about, the Statue of Liberty. It’s a big tall statue,; you can obviously recognize it. And since you know where you live according to the position of that statue, you don’t even have to be within eye distance of your house, you can use the statue to find your way home.

So, imagine the statue was not there, but a large black hole of nothingness in the shape of a rectangle. And all the similarities are gone from the area. Could you find your way home then? I would think not; you could eventually, through the trial and error system of checking houses, but you would not be able to use the landmark anymore to find your house. Lastly, this is comparable to the other two forces in this way: That we do not feel our relation of one object to the next, but rather we experience the knowledge that comes to us through this process of the brain.

Using this method and comparing it to the above stated forces, I have come up with two laws I believe are followed by both the conscious and the subconscious,

First:
Any object one is looking for has to be either in eyesight or must be able to be found through the use of a landmark. If it can be found through the use of another object, this means that there must be, in this universe, more than one object; one to find and one by which to find the wanted object.

Two:
The object used as a landmark cannot be moving. If there are more than one object being used to look for the destination object, then there must be two still objects; one by which you are able to judge the distance from your destination, and another by which you can determine your landmark object to be still (For if your landmark object were constantly moving, then it would be impossible to determine how far away from the destination you are).

Now, the Metaphysics of Relativity are just that: Relative. Friction and gravity relate to each other through the rules applied to them, and the world in which one cannot exist also cannot have the other.
In the same way, if there is friction and gravity, then you can have ideas of relativity in your mind. If there is no gravity or friction, and you were a single observer looking into the infinite universe, it would be impossible to determine what was what; not only because there would be infinite space, but also because there would be no way by which you could determine where you are in relation to what you are looking for.
This shows (If my logic is correct, which I do believe it is), then, that gravity cannot exist without friction, friction cannot exist without gravity, and humans, without either of these forces, cannot relate separate objects to each other.
I hope you enjoyed my attempt at useless logic.

~ZM~